Mechanism of futile creatine cycling in thermogenesis
Lawrence Kazak Am J physiol 12 NOV 2020
INTRODUCTION
The forward and reverse phosphotransfer reactions of phosphocreatine–creatine in most cells occur in a strict 1:1 stoichiometry with the ATP/ADP couple (9). However, mitochondria in thermogenic adipocytes liberate a large molar excess of ADP with respect to added creatine (2, 10). Based on bioenergetics principles and the established stoichiometry of the P/O ratio (ATP molecules synthesized per oxygen atom consumed) (23), we proposed two models wherein creatine might support this super-stoichiometric regeneration of ADP to drive thermogenic respiration in fat (10, 12, 18).
The first and simplest model is that a mitochondrial creatine kinase will use mitochondrial ATP to phosphorylate creatine to phosphocreatine (PCr), and the ensuing liberation of ADP locally within the organelle would be a powerful respiratory stimulus. Next, PCr would be the direct substrate of a phosphatase, which would replenish the mitochondrial creatine pool. The regenerated creatine from direct hydrolysis of PCr would act as a substrate for another round of this futile creatine cycle. Since we identified creatine-elicited respiration in isolated mitochondria (2, 10), but because crude mitochondrial preparations are not 100% pure, PCr hydrolase activity could be present within mitochondria themselves or on organelles that co-purify with them. Thus, either a pool of PCr and creatine circulate within the intermembrane space (IMS) or PCr is channeled out of the IMS toward PCr phosphatase activity that is external from mitochondria. The experimental data are consistent with either scenario (2, 10). We also proposed a second model where multiple phosphotransfer reactions might occur before phosphate hydrolysis from a phosphometabolite that lies downstream of PCr (10, 12). These variations on the futile creatine cycle have recently been extensively reviewed (12, 18).
Based on theoretical points founded in non-adipocyte work, Wallimann and colleagues (22) hypothesize that thermogenic adipocytes utilize the PCr/creatine kinase circuit (3) to fuel thermogenesis. In this circuit, mitochondrial creatine kinase generates PCr, which can diffuse throughout the cell to maintain high ATP/ADP ratios locally near sites of ATP consumption. In their hypothetical model, Wallimann et al. propose a creatine-driven calcium cycle wherein the PCr/creatine kinase circuit would support calcium cycling by sustaining a high ATP/ADP ratio at the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump (20). Operation of a PCr/creatine kinase circuit in adipocytes is not mutually exclusive with thermogenic futile creatine cycling in mitochondria. Nevertheless, the experimental evidence from studies conducted directly in thermogenic adipocytes eliminates the PCr/creatine kinase circuit as the molecular mechanism regulating creatine-driven thermogenesis.
We now provide point-by-point responses to the claims of Wallimann and colleagues:
Claim
1) Creatine kinase is the only confirmed enzyme that can use PCr as substrate.
At present, only creatine kinase has been identified to utilize PCr as substrate. However, we must refrain from using arguments from ignorance; absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The super-stoichiometric action of creatine in purified mitochondria from thermogenic adipocytes suggests that these preparations exhibit unique properties with respect to the chemistry of PCr. The appropriate experimental system and cell type required to identify non-creatine kinase proteins that metabolize PCr has, to our knowledge, never been implemented. A PCr phosphatase would hydrolyze PCr to creatine and Pi. All assays that monitor creatine kinase activity use indirect measurements of NAD and NADH absorbance and rely on phosphotransferase activity of creatine kinase. However, the direct measurement of products derived from the metabolism of PCr is required to study hydrolytic activity, and this has not yet been employed, thus obviating the ability to identify non-creatine kinase proteins that hydrolyze PCr.
Claim
2) The PCr/creatine kinase circuit supports calcium cycling.
The SERCA pump harnesses energy from ATP to pump Ca2+ into the SR/ER lumen against a steep concentration gradient, in a 2:1 stoichiometry of Ca2+:ATP. Deviation from the 2:1 stoichiometry of Ca2+:ATP is necessary for calcium cycling. Maintaining high local ATP/ADP ratios near SERCA is not a sufficient explanation for a futile calcium cycle. In muscle, a single-pass transmembrane peptide, sarcolipin, interacts with SERCA to decrease the Ca2+:ATP stoichiometry (21). However, sarcolipin is not expressed in fat (14, 19). A molecular factor akin to sarcolipin that modulates the stoichiometry of the SERCA-mediated Ca2+/ATPase influx relationship in thermogenic adipocytes has yet to be identified. Nevertheless, Wallimann and colleagues hypothesize that the PCr/creatine kinase circuit buffers ATP levels locally at the SERCA pump to support calcium cycling. A mechanism such as this would sustain a high ATP/ADP ratio near SERCA to increase the thermodynamic efficiency of ATP hydrolysis. However, calcium is not added to our mitochondrial preparations. Therefore, calcium cycling as an explanation for creatine-stimulated thermogenic respiration lacks experimental support and is therefore eliminated by published data (2, 10). Furthermore, SERCA inhibition only reduces the respiration of Ucp1−/−, not wild-type, adipocytes(8). In contrast, the futile creatine cycle does not require Ucp1 deletion (2, 10, 11, 13). Together, these data are not consistent with the idea that calcium cycling is fueled by the PCr/creatine kinase circuit and rule out the hypothesis that creatine and calcium support thermogenesis through the same pathway.
Claim
3) A PCr phosphatase would disrupt cell energetics.
Wallimann and colleagues hypothesize that a PCr phosphatase would disrupt cellular energetics. However, the release of free energy as heat is the defining feature of brown and beige adipocyte thermogenesis. Contrary to their opinion, we take the viewpoint that attacking the ATP pool directly by calcium cycling would be more dangerous for cellular energetics than attacking PCr, which will primarily form when ATP reaches sufficient levels.
Wallimann and colleagues conclude that creatine-driven thermogenesis does “not necessarily require the presence of a hypothetical, novel PCr phosphatase.” However, given the strong bioenergetics data in support of a PCr phosphatase, the current lack of molecular identification of this enzyme is a weak argument against its existence. From a historical perspective, mitochondria were the first organelles to be linked with calcium handling, an activity that was measured around the time that the chemi-osmotic theory was put forth (6, 15). Although this process was thoroughly investigated, it took half a century to identify the channel responsible for mitochondrial calcium accumulation (1, 5). Similarly, 40 years spanned between the earliest proposition of a mitochondrial pyruvate transporter and its molecular identification (4, 7, 16). Furthermore, lactate was once thought to be a cellular waste product but now, through utilization of isotope tracing techniques, is being recognized as a key nutrient, even rivaling glucose under specific physiological contexts (17).
Conclusion
The experimental data in thermogenic fat point to a two-enzyme system that utilizes mitochondrial-derived ADP phosphorylation to support cycling between creatine and PCr. A mitochondria-localized creatine kinase triggers the phosphorylation of creatine from mitochondrial ATP, which liberates local ADP to powerfully trigger respiration. Next, PCr is hydrolyzed to creatine by a PCr phosphatase to initiate another round of the futile creatine cycle. There is one point where we do agree with Wallimann and colleagues: diligent experimentation is required. We would further add that investigating creatine biology with modern molecular tools and diverse cell types has the potential to reveal functions for this ancient metabolite that until now have been overlooked. Finally, we will conclude our counterpoint by stating that we have now identified the creatine kinase isoenzyme and the PCr phosphatase of the futile creatine cycle. This work is currently in preparation.